- moved target.Interface into proc as proc.Process
- rename proc.IThread to proc.Thread
- replaced interfaces DisassembleInfo, Continuable and
EvalScopeConvertible with Process.
- removed superfluous Gdbserver prefix from types in the gdbserial
backend.
- removed superfluous Core prefix from types in the core backend.
* proc: Refactor stackIterator to use memoryReadWriter and BinaryInfo
* proc: refactor EvalScope to use memoryReadWriter and BinaryInfo
* proc: refactor Disassemble to use memoryReadWriter and BinaryInfo
* proc: refactor BinaryInfo part of proc.Process to own type
The data structures and associated code used by proc.Process
to implement target.BinaryInfo will also be useful to support a
backend for examining core dumps, split this part of proc.Process
to a different type.
* proc: compile support for all executable formats unconditionally
So far we only compiled in support for loading the executable format
supported by the host operating system.
Once support for core files is introduced it is however useful to
support loading in all executable formats, there is no reason why it
shouldn't be possible to examine a linux coredump on windows, or
viceversa.
* proc: bugfix: do not resume threads on detach if killing
* Replace BinaryInfo interface with BinInfo() method returning proc.BinaryInfo
Stack barriers were removed in Go 1.9, and thus code that
expected various stack-barrier-related symbols to exist
does not find them. Check for their absence and do not
crash when they are missing. Disable stack-barrier-handling
test for 1.9 and beyond.
Fixes#754.
On Windows we can sometimes encounter threads stopped in locations for
which we do not have entries in debug_frame.
These cases seem to be due to calls to Windows API in the go runtime,
we can still produce a (partial) stack trace in this circumstance by
following frame pointers (starting with BP).
We still prefer debug_frame entries when available since go functions
do not have frame pointers before go1.8.
The PC we have is relative to the first instruction after the CALL
instruction currently being executed.
Anyone watching a disassembly will understand what's happening if we
report the return PC, but reporting the first PC of the current line is
useless and confusing.
